\"Sport for Life\": Designing a Positioning Line That Earns Its Place in Daily Marketing

**Most positioning lines die in the brand deck. They get presented to leadership, earn a polite round of nods, occasionally show up on slide 4 of the next pitch, and then they're forgotten. The marketing team uses different language. The website lands on a different tagline. The ads are written without anyone consulting the positioning document.**

"Sport for Life", the positioning we wrote for Drive FITT, India's first cricket-integrated fitness studio, works differently. Three years in, it shows up daily in the brand's marketing communication. Founders quote it in interviews. Coaches paraphrase it in class. The line has earned its operational place, not just its strategic place.

The difference between positioning that lives in the deck and positioning that lives in the work isn't about how good the line is. It's about how the line was *designed*. Here are the five tests we use to know whether a positioning line will survive contact with the marketing team, and how we applied them to land on "Sport for Life" specifically.

— — —

What Drive FITT actually is (the brief)

Before the positioning, the context. Drive FITT is a 24/7 membership-based gym facility that integrates cricket training with general fitness. The company was co-founded by Indian cricket star Shubman Gill, actor Preity G Zinta, and Australian operators Mark Sellar and Deke Smith. Cricket training programs were developed with Australian cricketers Chris Lynn and Ryan Harris. Glenn Maxwell is an investor.

Founded with India-first expansion ambition: 300 locations across India within three years. The first location opened with 100+ founding members signed up before doors opened. The category they were entering, cricket-integrated fitness, didn't really exist as a defined consumer category in 2024. There were cricket academies. There were fitness centers. The hybrid was novel.

Our brief was positioning + verbal identity, not the full brand identity (that was being handled in parallel by a separate visual team). The deliverable was a positioning document that would carry the brand's verbal language across launch, expansion, and daily marketing.

— — —

The positioning challenge

When you're positioning a category-creating brand, the standard moves fail:

• "Better than X" doesn't work when there's no clear X, Drive FITT isn't "better than your gym" because no gym does what they do
• "First to do Y" works for one campaign cycle, then fades, being India's first cricket-integrated fitness studio is true, but it dates the brand
• Aspirational tagline language ("Push your limits", "Beyond fitness", "Unleash your inner athlete") is interchangeable with every other gym brand
• Founder-centric positioning ("Built by Shubman Gill") leans on the celebrity but doesn't create category meaning

We needed a line that:

1. Named what Drive FITT was about, not what it does
2. Worked for the cricket fanatic who would pay for serious cricket training AND for the general-fitness member who didn't know a cover drive from a square cut
3. Carried beyond the launch into year 2, year 5, year 10
4. Was specific enough to make wrong customers self-select out
5. Could be quoted, paraphrased, and used by the marketing team without needing translation

After about 40 candidate lines through three working sessions with the founders, we landed on "Sport for Life."

— — —

Why "Sport for Life" works

Three words. Two meanings, both intentional.

**Reading one**: "Sport for life" as in *lifelong*. Drive FITT isn't a 12-week transformation challenge or a temporary cricket academy. It's a place you can train at when you're 22 and when you're 62. The cricket programs scale from competitive players to weekend hobbyists. The fitness programs accommodate every fitness level. The membership model assumes you'll keep showing up for years, not crash-train for a beach holiday.

**Reading two**: "Sport for life" as in *sport as a way of living*. Drive FITT's premise isn't fitness as a means to an end (looking better, fitting into clothes, hitting a number on the scale). It's sport as the end itself, the playing, the practicing, the showing-up, the discipline of being someone who trains because the training is its own thing. The cricket angle reinforces this, cricket players play. They don't "work out." The implicit positioning is: you're a sportsperson, not a gym person.

Both readings land. Either interpretation makes Drive FITT feel like itself and not like a generic gym brand. The line works whether you read it as "fitness across your lifespan" or "sport as a life orientation."

— — —

The five tests for positioning that survives daily marketing

These are the tests we run on every positioning line before signing off. Drive FITT's "Sport for Life" passes all five. Most candidate positioning lines fail at least two.

Test 1: The headline test

Read the line as if it's the entire headline of a billboard. Does it work alone, with no support copy, no hero image, no logo? Does it make a person stop and think?

"Sport for Life" passes. As a standalone billboard it raises one of two questions: *Is this an athletic brand or a fitness brand?* and *Does sport-for-life mean sport across my lifespan or sport as my life?* Both questions pull attention. A line that doesn't raise a question doesn't get remembered.

Candidate lines that failed this test for Drive FITT:

• "Beyond fitness", generic, raises no question
• "The future of training", vague aspiration, no specificity
• "Train like an athlete", too prescriptive, sounds like a campaign tagline rather than a positioning anchor

Test 2: The ad-copy test

Can the marketing team start a hundred different ads with this line and have them all feel on-brand?

We tested "Sport for Life" against fifteen different ad concept directions, cricket-led, fitness-led, lifestyle-led, equipment-led, location-led, member-story-led. Every one of them worked when "Sport for Life" was the anchor.

This is the test most positioning lines fail. A line that only works for the launch campaign isn't a positioning line, it's a launch tagline. The two get confused constantly. Positioning lines have to work for ads you haven't conceived yet.

Test 3: The headline-of-internal-meeting test

Can the founders use this line in an internal meeting as shorthand for "are we on-brand here?" without anyone needing to ask what it means?

A year into Drive FITT's operations, this is exactly what happens. Founders use "is this Sport for Life?" as a yes/no test on new campaign directions, new program offerings, new partnership decisions. It works as decision shorthand because the line is short enough to remember and specific enough to make decisions against.

Candidate lines that failed this test:

• "Train hard, live well", too long, too feel-good, doesn't anchor decisions
• "Cricket, fitness, and everything between", descriptive of services, not a position
• "Where sport meets life", sounds positioning-y but doesn't anchor a decision (everything could "meet life")

Test 4: The non-customer test

Does the line make the wrong customer self-select out?

This is critical and most agencies get it wrong. The instinct is to write positioning lines that maximize the audience, they should appeal to everyone. The right move is the opposite: write positioning lines that make non-customers immediately know "this isn't for me."

"Sport for Life" tells someone looking for a 12-week weight-loss program that this is the wrong place. It tells someone looking for a yoga and meditation retreat that this is the wrong place. It tells someone looking for a cricket-specialist academy that this is partially the wrong place (Drive FITT does serious cricket but isn't only that). The line filters.

The right kind of customer reads it and thinks "yes, that's me." The wrong kind reads it and thinks "that's not what I want." Both responses are useful. A positioning line that makes everyone feel "yeah, I guess" is doing no work.

Test 5: The decade test

Will this line still work in ten years?

Some positioning lines are time-stamped to their launch moment. "Disruptor", "next-generation", "the new way to...", all date themselves immediately. "Sport for Life" doesn't. It doesn't reference current cricket players, current fitness trends, current technology. It could have been written in 1995 or in 2050 and still mean the same thing.

This isn't a creativity flex. It's a practical decision. Positioning lines that need to be updated every five years are positioning lines that are doing partial work, they're capturing a moment rather than a position. A position that's true in 2026 should still be true in 2036 unless the business fundamentally changes.

— — —

How the line shows up in daily marketing (concrete examples)

Three years in, here's where "Sport for Life" actually appears (with the founders' permission to discuss):

• Web hero: "Train for life. At Drive FITT." (variations: "Sport for Life starts here.")
• **Membership signup flow**: "You're not signing up for a gym. You're signing up for Sport for Life."
• **Coach onboarding**: "We don't run workouts. We coach Sport for Life."
• **Instagram bio**: "Sport for Life · India's first cricket-integrated fitness studio"
• **Press interviews**: founders consistently use "Sport for Life" when asked to summarize the brand
• **Partnership pitch deck**: opening slide is "Sport for Life" with the studios + cricket academy + members context
• **Internal decision shorthand**: "Is this on-brand for Sport for Life?" as a sanity check on new initiatives

The line shows up because it's load-bearing, it actually carries weight in the work, rather than sitting decoratively in the brand deck.

— — —

What makes positioning lines fail (the patterns we see)

Three failure modes show up repeatedly in positioning we've inherited from other agencies:

Failure 1: The line is too long

If the positioning is more than 5-7 words, it won't show up daily. Marketers will summarize it (badly) for short formats. They'll paraphrase it (inconsistently) for ads. The line that started as a 12-word elegant positioning statement becomes 8 different paraphrases within 6 months. By month 12, the original line isn't recognizable.

"Sport for Life" is three words. That's the upper end of memorability for daily-use positioning.

Failure 2: The line is too generic

"Empowering people through wellness" could be any brand. "Better fitness for busy people" could be any brand. Generic lines feel safe in the brand deck because they don't make any specific claim, which is exactly why they don't earn their place in the work. The marketing team has no reason to use this line over any other line.

Failure 3: The line is too specific to one feature

"24/7 cricket training in Bangalore" is too specific. It's true, but it's a feature description, not a position. When Drive FITT expands beyond Bangalore (which the plan calls for), the line breaks. When they add yoga or running programs, the line breaks. Positions that are too specific to a single launch feature don't survive product expansion.

Failure 4: The line is too aspirational

"Reach your highest potential" is meaningless. "Be the athlete you were meant to be" is meaningless. Aspirational language without specific content is positioning theatre, it sounds important but does no work. The test: can a competitor use the same line? If yes, the line isn't a position.

Failure 5: The line tries to do too much

Positioning lines that try to capture the entire brand promise, the values, the offer, the audience, the unique selling proposition, usually capture none of it well. A position is one thing. Pick the one thing the brand is about and make the line specifically about that. "Sport for Life" is about the orientation Drive FITT asks of members. It doesn't try to also be about cricket, fitness, location, equipment, or community, those things live in the brand's broader voice and visual identity. The position itself is one anchor.

— — —

When NOT to write a positioning line at all

A note for new founders: not every brand needs a positioning line. Some brands work better with a clear category claim + a strong visual identity + a consistent voice, without a memorable line at the center.

Brands that probably do need a positioning line:

• Category-creating brands (because they need a way to explain what category they're in)
• Brands with significant ambition to expand beyond a single product or service
• Brands operating in crowded markets where differentiation is the primary challenge
• Brands that will rely on word-of-mouth (positioning lines are easier to repeat than visual identities)

Brands that probably don't need one:

• Single-product brands with clear category understanding (e.g., a SaaS tool that does one specific thing)
• B2B brands where the buyer journey involves multiple long-form interactions (positioning shows up differently, in proposal language, in case studies, in pricing logic)
• Brands where the founder or product is already the dominant positioning anchor (a chef-led restaurant doesn't need a positioning line as much as a chef's recognizable point of view)

Drive FITT needed one because of the category-creating element + the multi-segment audience (cricket fanatics + general fitness members) + the expansion ambition.

— — —

FAQ

How long does it take to land a positioning line like Sport for Life?

Drive FITT's positioning engagement took roughly 6 weeks from kickoff to signed-off positioning document. The line itself emerged around week 3, three working sessions in. The remaining time was pressure-testing the line, drafting how it shows up across marketing surfaces, and writing the broader positioning document (audience, category, brand voice, messaging hierarchy) that the line anchors.

What's the difference between a positioning line and a tagline?

Positioning lines anchor brand decisions for years. Taglines anchor campaigns for months. Sport for Life is a positioning line. "This Diwali, gift fitness" would be a tagline. Most brands need a positioning line and rotate taglines under it.

Should the positioning line appear on the website hero?

Not necessarily. Lucky Chan's positioning line, which we won't share publicly per agreement, doesn't appear on their web hero. The web hero leads with the dishes and the place. The positioning shows up in voice, in tone, in what gets emphasized. For Drive FITT, the line does appear in marketing communication directly because the category needed explanation.

Who owns the positioning line, the agency or the client?

The client. Always. Once delivered, the positioning belongs to them, to use, paraphrase, evolve, or eventually replace. We've had positioning lines we wrote evolve in ways we wouldn't have predicted (or sometimes recommended), and that's the point. The line has to belong to the team using it daily, not to the agency that wrote it.

Can ChatGPT or Claude write a positioning line?

Not yet, well. We've tested. LLMs produce positioning lines that are technically correct (right length, right structure, right tone) but consistently miss the specific tension that makes a position load-bearing. Sport for Life works because of the two-reading double-meaning that requires understanding both cricket culture and Indian fitness market dynamics. AI assists with brainstorming (we use it for initial concept exploration), but the actual line-landing is human work.

What if the founders pick a positioning line we don't recommend?

It happens. Our job is to land on the best line we can argue for, present the case, and pressure-test the founder's preferred alternative against our tests. Sometimes our line wins. Sometimes the founder's wins. Sometimes a third synthesis emerges from the conversation. We don't ship positioning we can't defend, but we also don't override the founder's instinct when they have strong conviction, they live with the line, we don't.

How do you know a positioning line is actually working in the market?

Three signals: (1) founders use it in interviews without being prompted; (2) the marketing team applies it without checking back with us; (3) when you Google the brand, the line shows up in third-party coverage (not just self-published content). Sport for Life now passes all three for Drive FITT.

— — —

*Drive FITT's "Sport for Life" positioning is one of 100+ identity systems NOW Media has built end-to-end since 2019. NOW Media is a Bangalore creative studio founded by Nithin Koshy and Divya Maben, a brand of Bleep Design Private Limited. Start your scope or view the Branding service.*

Internal links

• Pillar: /services/branding
• Related: /methodology
• Related case study: /work/drive-fitt (when published)
• Related article: /thinking/lucky-chan-system-built-to-expand
• Related article: /thinking/naming-a-brand-in-2026
• Scope CTA: /#scope
• Author byline: /about#nithin-koshy